The
University of Oxford
is urging council officials to permit the inclusion of five soldiers on a war memorial, despite their conflict with Britain during the
First World War
.
Queen’s College has submitted an application to the planning authorities with the intention of including ‘members of the college community’ among the 121 individuals already listed on the memorial situated on High Street in Oxford.
However, critics argue that this change, permitting the addition of three German soldiers, represents ‘woke’ ideology.
Created by Sir Reginald Blomfield and revealed in October 1920, the monument honors those who served with the Allied forces. However, a recent submission to the Oxford City Council seeks to have all affiliated with the college commemorated instead, regardless of their national origin.
The additions will feature Carl Heinrich Hertz, born in Hamburg, Germany, along with Gustav Adolf Jacobi, hailing originally from Weimar.
Erich Joachim Peucer, born in Colmar which was part of the German Empire at that time and passed away in
Italy
In 1917, this is also included among the supplementary names.
The remaining two individuals include Hungary’s Paul Nicholas Esterházy, who enrolled in 1901 and passed away in 1915.
Poland
, and Emile Jacot who sustained wounds during combat, ultimately succumbing to his injuries in 1928.
The monument adorned with two large stone slabs, each crowned with a bronze garland, bears the inscriptions: “They yielded their lives to the Commonwealth and gained eternal remembrance,” along with “A praise that shall endure forever.”



The planning document mentioned: “The World War I monument located outside the library excludes individuals who were not part of the British forces.”
This was typical for the period when the monument was built (1921). When colleges initially constructed their memorials, they usually did not honor individuals who had fought against the Allies—whether this omission resulted from a conscious choice or simply due to oversight.
To sum up, we believe that these suggestions represent a suitable and discreet approach considering the surrounding architecture. They are warranted by the necessity to honor every member of the college community who perished in the First World War, regardless of their national origin.

However, Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, stated that the monument should solely act as a tribute to those who battled for Britain and the Allied forces.
He stated to The Telegraph, “The war memorials in the UK ought to serve as a tribute to those who made the supreme sacrifice to safeguard and defend the Allied countries.”
Where will this nonsense stop?
Out of the 14,561 members from Oxford University who joined the armed forces, approximately one-fifth had lost their lives by the conclusion of the First World War.
Among those who lost their lives was the distinguished military leader Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig, along with the accomplished composer George Butterworth.
The Oxford City Council is anticipated to reveal its verdict within the coming several weeks.
MailOnline has reached out to Oxford University for their input.
Read more