oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | crime, criminal justice, criminal prosecution, hungary, politics and law
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ignoring an arrest warrant during his trip to Budapest. The International Criminal Court has few ways to react.
As one of the 125 member states of the International Criminal Court, Hungary has a legal responsibility to detain Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he arrives in Budapest and immediately send him to The Hague as per the ICC’s assertion that he is accused of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity during the conflict in Gaza.
Instead, what’s occurring is that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is welcoming the Israeli leader with open arms through a grandiose four-day visit filled with opulent displays of unity.
In November 2024, when arrest warrants were issued for Netanyahu and Israel’s ex-defense minister, Yoav Gallant, Orban described the ICC as “audacious, manipulative, and utterly unacceptable.” He vowed that should Netanyahu ever visit Hungary, he would ensure both his liberty and security.
ICC’s limited response
In contrast to national courts, which utilize their domestic law enforcement agencies for enforcing arrest warrants, international courts depend on the judicial systems of their member states to apprehend and hand over suspects; the ICC lacks its own police force.
If a nation does not apprehend an accused individual, the ICC judges may start what is known as a non-compliance procedure. This process could lead to a referral to either the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties (ASP) or the United Nations Security Council.
Despite referral instances, the ASP has limited ability to enforce significant penalties against nations that fail to meet their commitments.
“There are not significant real-world repercussions for failing to comply,” said Mathias Holvoet, who lectures in international criminal law at the University of Amsterdam, speaking to SANGGRALOKA.
He anticipates that the ICC will initiate this process, though his expectations of its potential outcomes remain modest.
The ICC is often depicted as a giant lacking limbs—it genuinely struggles to enforce those arrest warrants. The impetus for action rests with the state’s political determination.
The Israeli leader is additionally encouraged by his support at the White House, with U.S. President Donald Trump being an ally.
issued an executive order
In February, sanctions were imposed on the ICC and its Chief Prosecutor, Karim Khan, specifically in reaction to their involvement with the Netanyahu case.
‘Illiberal ideological allies’
According to certain analysts, the reception offered by Hungary is exactly what Netanyahu aims to use in order to reduce the court’s reliability.
“He aims to visit numerous countries to demonstrate that the ICC is merely a paper tiger and incapable of enforcing the arrest warrant against him,” explains Holvoet from the University of Amsterdam.
Some think this journey also advances Netanyahu’s domestic political objectives.
Daniel Hegedus, an expert on Hungary and regional director for the German Marshall Fund, stated, “He has shown that the arrest isn’t as crucial as several figures within his internal opposition suggest.” He added, “This trip highlights his connections, sway, and capacity for political action.”
Hegebus noted that Orban is providing a platform for his longstanding illiberal ideological partner, which aligns closely with the fresh policy stance coming out of Washington.
Jurisdiction friction
The ICC is a UN-backed court established as the last resort for prosecuting the world’s worst crimes, including genocide. Notably, China, Russia, and the United States are also members.
Israel is not part of the ICC and insists that the court does not have the authority to charge any of its citizens.
In 2015, the Palestinian territories became members of the court, which led ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan to believe he had the authority to seek this action.
Netanyahu warrant
in May 2024.
The evidence presented by the ICC against Netanyahu relates to his supposed role in employing hunger as a tactic of combat, committing murders, engaging in persecution, and carrying out other cruel actions during the conflict in Gaza.
A number of country heads have asserted diplomatic immunity during their travels even though they had outstanding arrest warrants from global tribunals.
In January,
Poland
stated that it would allow Netanyahu to tour Holocaust memorials even with the ICC warrant in place, and in March, Germany’s chancellor candidate
Friedrich Merz
extend an invitation to their Israeli peer to tour Berlin.
Legal scholars still argue about whether head-of-state immunity holds more weight than charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Netanyahu’s visit carries some potential dangers.
Specialists think Netanyahu is still risking his liberty by traveling to a nation that is part of the ICC.
As Holvoet pointed out, ‘One can’t predict how a particular judge in a specific city might act.’
NGOs often submit petitions to Hungarian courts with the aim of pressuring for his arrest. As Holvoet pointed out, “While the danger might not be substantial, it does persist.”
Israeli authorities have acknowledged that during Netanyahu’s travel to the United States in February, his aircraft had to follow a more extended path over American military installations to avoid landing in a nation that honors ICC arrest warrants.
Daniel Hegedus, however, thinks that the likelihood of Netanyahu being detained in Hungary is virtually nonexistent.
Hungary is not considered a fully democratic nation, and it’s clear that the rule of law has been significantly influenced,” he stated. “I strongly question whether any law enforcement agencies in Hungary would adhere to judicial decisions rather than following directives from the government.”
Edited by: Rob Mudge
Author: Jack Parrock (located in Brussels)
oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | controversies, courts, news, politics, politics and law
New Delhi [India], April 1 (ANI): The
Supreme Court
On Tuesday mentioned that they will review the submission of
YouTuber
and Podcaster
Ranveer Allahabadia
to return his passport for international travel following the inquiry into the matter related to the contentious comments he and others made during an episode
India’s Got Latent
is completed.
The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who represents the Maharashtra government, informed the Supreme Court that the investigation in the case would be concluded within two weeks.
The bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and NK Singh further prolonged the temporary order shielding the podcast host from potential arrest.
FIR
are registered against him in
Guwahati
, Mumbai and Jaipur.
The petitioner has pledged that his program, which has been approved, will uphold propriety standards and avoid discussing matters currently under judicial consideration across various platforms. In response to inquiries, the Solicitor General stated that investigations in the pending case continue.
FIR
It is expected to be finished within the next fourteen days.
“As the petitioner could potentially be needed to participate in the current investigation, his request for the return of his passport and permission to travel overseas will be reviewed once the investigation has concluded,” the document read.
The supreme court was considering his appeal requesting the consolidation of
FIR
are registered against him nationwide due to contentious comments made by him and other participants during an incident.
India’s Got Latent
.
Previously, the highest court allowed Allahabadia to restart his podcast ‘The Ranveer Show,’ with the condition that he uphold standards of propriety and ethics.
This enabled Allahabadia to continue the program after considering that the employment of approximately 280 staff members relies on broadcasting his show.
Prior to that, the bench had ordered Allahabadia and his associates to stay away from show business for a certain period.
The top court had come down heavily on Allahabadia for his inappropriate comments during his guest appearance on the show, and described it as “dirty and perverted.”
The supreme court had likewise instructed that no additional action should be taken.
FIR
will be recorded against him based on the episode broadcasted on the program. Additionally, they have requested him to submit his passport to the police and he is prohibited from leaving the country without obtaining approval from the court.
The organization additionally queried whether the Centre desired to intervene concerning explicit material on platforms like YouTube and various social media outlets, and requested support from both the Attorney General and Solicitor General pertaining to this issue.
On February 11, Assam’s Chief Minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, stated the following:
Guwahati
Police has registered an
FIR
against
YouTuber
and social media personalities like Allahabadia, Samay Raina, Ashish Chanchlani, Jaspreet Singh, Apoorva Makhija, among others, for advocating inappropriate content and participating in sexually graphic and crude conversations.
India’s Got Latent
.
FIR
Several cases have been filed against them in Mumbai and
Guwahati
. (ANI)
Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).
oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | donald trump, news, politics, politics and government, politics and law
-
Le Pen’s aspirations for the presidency were thwarted following the ruling in France.
-
FURTHER READING: French Judge Handling Le Pen Case Receives Security Due to Threats
-
PODCAST: Round three for Trump, Musk parts ways with DOGE – plus insights from the ex-Denmark ambassador on what’s best for Greenland. Tune in now.
President
Donald Trump
compared himself to the convicted French presidential hopeful
Marine Le Pen
, describing her disqualification from holding elective offices as “a very significant matter.”
“That’s quite significant. That’s really a major development,” Trump stated to journalists in the Oval Office.
He showed empathy towards Le Pen and mentioned that her circumstances “sound quite similar to what this country is experiencing.”
I’m well aware of everything, and many believed she wouldn’t face any convictions. While I’m not sure if it counts as a conviction, she was barred from running for office for half a decade, yet she remains the frontrunner. It seems so typical of this nation,” he concluded.
On Monday, Le Pen, aged 56, was found guilty of establishing fictitious employment positions within the European Parliament and misusing expense allowances to pay staffers who were primarily working for her political party.
France
.
The leader of the far-right RN party was prohibited from holding public office for five years and received a four-year prison term; however, she won’t serve time behind bars since half of her sentence is suspended, and the remainder will be carried out under house arrest with an electronic monitor.
Trump has frequently presented himself as a victim of a government-led “witch hunt” and investigations driven by political motives.
Trump has been subject to many lawsuits from state and federal governments:
-
In 2024, New York State found him guilty of tampering with business documents concerning payments made to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels. However, his sentencing has been put off indefinitely after he won a second term as president.
-
Before the November 2024, a federal judge dismissed the federal charges relating to Trump’s handling of classified documents
-
Following Trump’s victory in the election, the special counsel opted to drop the federal charges connected to the 2020 electoral process, referring to the Justice Department’s guideline of avoiding prosecution for incumbent presidents.
-
A case against in Georgia is on pause while the courts decide whether a state-level prosecutor can prosecute a sitting president
He refuted any claims of misconduct in all the cases.
Various members of the Trump administration have supported President Trump’s position regarding Le Pen.
Trump’s DOGE adviser
Elon Musk
also criticized the French court’s ruling
, saying: ‘When the radical left can’t win via democratic vote, they abuse the legal system to jail their opponents. This is their standard playbook throughout the world.’
And S
The State Department representative Tammy Bruce mentioned that they were aware of Le Pen’s sentencing.
‘The exclusion of individuals from participating in politics is especially troubling considering the relentless and dishonest legal attacks launched against President [Donald] Trump in this country,’ Bruce stated.
However, she chose not to comment specifically about Le Pen’s situation.
The ruling on Monday was viewed as
a significant setback for Le Pen’s longstanding ambitions to ascend to the presidency in 2027
.
She was additionally required to pay a $100,000 fine, and her party had $2 million deducted from their funds—$1 million immediately, with another $1 million pending should they violate the rules again.
Le Pen has the option to appeal her sentence. Should the appeal not succeed, she faces a four-year jail term—two years suspended with two years to serve under house arrest.
Twenty-four individuals, including Le Pen, were found guilty; they were all either RN party officials or aides. Just one defendant was cleared of any misconduct.
Le Pen stated she intends to file an appeal.
She contended that the court shouldn’t have rendered her ineligible to run for office without allowing her to exhaust all possible appeals first. She also asserted that the ruling clearly demonstrated an intent ‘to specifically thwart’ her election as president.
“If that isn’t a political decision, then I’m not sure what qualifies as one,” Le Pen stated during the TF1 interview.
She stated that the decision represented a ‘critical moment for our democracy,’ yet she affirmed her commitment to continue pursuing what she referrednown as the somewhat limited path to the presidency.
“There are millions of French individuals who have faith in me, millions who place their trust in me,” she said additionally.
‘I have been advocating for you for three decades, and during this time, I have also stood up against injustice. Therefore, I will keep up my fight.’
She can retain her position in the French National Assembly.
Amidst the extensive criticism surrounding the verdict, one of France’s leading public prosecutors dismissed the notion that politics played any role in Monday’s ruling.
“Justice is apolitical; this isn’t a political choice but rather a legal one made by three independent and unbiased judges,” said Remy Heitz during an interview with RTL radio station.
Not only Trump expressed criticism of the verdict; other conservative figures across Europe also condemned it sharply.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni stated that the decision disqualifying Le Pen has deprived millions of French and European Union voters of their right to vote.
“I am not aware of the validity of the charges against Marine Le Pen or the rationale behind such a stringent measure,” said Meloni, who leads the Brothers of Italy party, in an interview with Il Messaggero.
However, I believe that nobody concerned with democracy can feel joy over a verdict that penalizes the head of a significant political party and disenfranchises millions of voters.
Russia also waded in.
The Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told journalists: “An increasing number of European cities are adopting policies that disregard democratic principles.”
Absolutely, we have no intention of interfering with France’s domestic matters; this has always been our stance… However, broadly speaking, our analysis of various European cities indicates that these places are quite open to transcending democratic norms throughout their political procedures.
Read more
oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | controversies, news, politics, politics and government, politics and law
Kochi
(
Kerala
) [India], April 1 (ANI): The
Kerala
High Court on Tuesday refused to put a stay on the screening of the film ‘L2:
Empuraan
while listening to the appeal of the ex-
BJP
Thrissur district committee member
Vijeesh Vettam
.
The
BJP
has taken disciplinary action against Vettam, who approached the High Court against the Prithviraj directed film which stars actor Mohanlal, a release from
BJP
media cell said.
“Former
BJP
Thrissur district committee member
Vijeesh Vettam
has been suspended from the party. He was suspended from primary membership.
Kerala
High Court has refused to put a stay on the screening of the film. The petition alleges that the film promotes anti-nationalism and paves the way for religious hatred”, the release further mentioned.
The petition cites the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Film Certification Board, and Team
Empuraan
, and the State police chief as opposition parties”, the release added.
However, Vettam said he endorses the party’s choice and emphasized that his move to take the matter to court was a personal one. He also mentioned that he will proceed with legal action concerning the film.
According to the
BJP
Thrissur district committee member, the film has an agenda of communal polarization and financial gain”, which forces people like him, who intervene at the grassroots level, to respond. Despite the disciplinary action, Vettam affirmed that he would remain with the party.
BJP
Justin Jacob, who serves as the president of the Thrissur district, mentioned that Vijeesh lodged the complaint in his role as a member of the district committee, which led to the party taking action. Additionally, he stated that the
BJP
Would impose stringent measures against individuals violating its policies, with additional reviews scheduled for the issue. (ANI)
Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).
oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | government, politics, politics and government, politics and law, public policy
Lucknow (
Uttar Pradesh
[India], April 1 (ANI):
Uttar Pradesh
Minister
Danish Azad Ansari
On Tuesday expressed backing for the
Waqf Amendment Bill
, indicating that Muslims are supporting Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the suggested bill.
In discussions with ANI, Ansari stated that a typical Muslim holds the belief that
Waqf Amendment Bill
is vital for the growth of the Muslim community.
“A typical Muslim holds the belief that the
Waqf Amendment Bill
“is crucial for the progress of the Muslim community. It is astounding how certain individuals and political entities are neglecting the well-being of Muslims solely for their own benefits,” he stated.
“Some individuals object to this bill as it places land rights under waqf in the hands of a select few. The general Muslim population supports Narendra Modi,” said the BJP MLA.
The
Waqf Amendment Bill
Is anticipated to be presented in Parliament on Wednesday. The BJP released a whip to all its Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members on Tuesday, instructing them to attend Parliament on April 2 and 4, respectively.
Nevertheless, the opposition has actively voiced its criticisms regarding this issue.
Waqf Amendment Bill
The India bloc floor leaders convened in Parliament to deliberate on the strategy.
Waqf Amendment Bill
to be tabled tomorrow.
The legislation was initially introduced in the Lok Sabha last August, after which a Joint Parliamentary Committee led by Jagdambika Pal was established for additional review.
This legislation intends to revise the Waqf Act from 1995 with the purpose of tackling problems and hurdles associated with overseeing and handling Waqf property. The proposed amendment looks to boost the governance and stewardship of these assets within India. By addressing deficiencies found in earlier versions of the act, this new measure endeavors to refine the effectiveness of Waqf councils through various modifications. These include relabeling the statute, refining the terminology around waqf, streamlining the documentation procedures, and amplifying technological integration for maintaining Waqf data.
The Waqf Act of 1995, which was put in place to manage Waqf properties, has frequently faced criticism due to problems like poor administration, corruption, and unauthorized intrusions. (ANI)
Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc.
Syndigate.info
).
oleh admin | Apr 1, 2025 | government, political science, politics, politics and government, politics and law
On Tuesday, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents the Kogi Central Senatorial District, called upon Nigerians to blame Senate President Godswill Akpabio, Kogi State Governor Ahmed Ododo, and former governor Yahaya Bello should she and her followers face any attacks.
Akpoti-Uduaghan sounded the warning in a posting on her official Facebook page.
She stated, “Dear residents of Kogi Central, I am looking forward to our tranquil Sallah festivities today.”
Nevertheless, if we encounter or are subjected to violence, Nigerians ought to entirely blame Governor Òdodo, Yahaya Bello, and SP Godswill Akpabio.
Her caution follows shortly after she asserted in a statement that she intends to proceed with her planned trip to her constituency during the Eid-al-Fitr holiday and the rally set for when she returns.
The senator additionally encouraged her followers to ignore rumors circulating that she has canceled her planned appearance.
Although emphasizing her legal duty as a legislator advocating for her constituents, the challenged senator urged her followers to gather together to join her in marking the celebration of Eid-el-Fitr.
On Monday, the government of Kogi State imposed a ban on rallies and public meetings within the state due to ‘security concerns’.
The authorities halted fishing and similar activities, claiming these pursuits were responsible for the deaths of two individuals in Kasemiya, Katubo, and Umozu Ette—all within the Kogi Local Government Area in Kogi West—just recently.
Commissioner Kingsley Fanwo, who oversees information, stated that this step was taken to avoid any potential security breaches that could disrupt the stability of the state.
In a similar vein, the Kogi Police Command cautioned Akpoti-Uduagan against proceeding with her intended Sallah rally.
The Kogi State Commissioner of Police, Miller Dantawaye, indicated that the proposed assembly contradicts the state government’s recently imposed prohibition on political gatherings. This ban was declared on Monday.
In the meantime, videos allegedly showing a rally for the senator’s return began circulating on social media platforms.
At the time of submitting this report, Senator Bashir Haroon from Kogi State broadcasted a live video clip depicting thousands of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s followers—predominantly women—who were enthusiastically singing and beating drums in eager expectation of her arrival.
Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).
Halaman 4 dari 20« Awal«...23456...1020...»Akhir »
