oleh admin | Agu 22, 2025 | controversies, crime, military, police and law enforcement, politics
Released on, Aug. 19 — August 19, 2025 at 6:58 AM
The people of Balochistan have endured prolonged treachery. On Monday, Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti announced the capture of a suicide attacker and claimed the scheme originated from a university professor, Dr Muhammad Usman Qazi.
It is alarming that an instructor responsible for molding young intellects was found to be associated with extremists and connected to the November 2024 Quetta railway station attack, representing a troubling and hazardous development.
If accurate, this breakdown goes further than one individual explosion. Parents shouldn’t be left questioning whether educators are equipping pupils for tests, or for shelters.
However, the arrest occurs within a broader, more violent context. Violence in Balochistan has increased significantly over the last two years, with militant attacks increasing by over 80 percent in 2024 alone. Quetta, Khuzdar, Kalat—each has suffered from destructive assaults.
The BLA’s “Herof” operation last summer resulted in over 70 deaths, including deliberate strikes against Punjabis. The current year began with the seizure of the Jaffar Express, as hundreds of civilians and military staff have perished within the last 18 months.
Beyond standard definitions, what is occurring in Balochistan seems to be an uprising that has evolved—combining messaging with armed conflict and taking advantage of gaps within institutions, including those found in academic settings.
Therefore, the state’s reaction should be realistic. If the proof regarding Dr. Qazi is valid, it needs to be examined in public court, rather than remaining just within media statements. Meanwhile, although monitoring is important, blaming whole organizations could lead to increased feelings of being disconnected.
Balochistan must not face yet another round of railway station explosions and assaults on school buses. Similarly, Pakistan cannot tolerate educational institutions turning into channels for terrorism. The sole means to end the province’s prolonged, continuous pattern of conflict is through justice—justice that is open, trustworthy, and conclusive. *
oleh admin | Agu 15, 2025 | armed forces, incident, military, military aircraft, warfare
Pakistan, August 10 – Defense Minister Khawaja Asif firmly dismissed statements made by the head of the Indian Air Force alleging that India had downed six Pakistani fighter planes during a clash in May, labeling these reports as “unbelievable” and “inopportune.”
Asif stated in a release, the late claims by the head of the Indian Air Force about supposed damage to Pakistani planes during Operation Sindoor are both unlikely and poorly timed.
The defense official’s statement was accompanied by comments from India’s Air Force commander, who stated on Saturday that India had destroyed five Pakistani fighter planes and an additional military plane during skirmishes in May, marking the nation’s initial public assertion of this nature following its most severe armed confrontation with its neighbor in recent years.
During a gathering held in the southern Indian city of Bengaluru, Indian Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh stated that the majority of Pakistani planes were shot down by India’s Russian-built S-400 air defense system. He referenced electronic monitoring information as proof of the attacks.
“At least five combatants have been confirmed dead, along with one major aircraft,” he stated, noting that the large aircraft, possibly a reconnaissance plane, was brought down from a distance of 300 kilometers (186 miles).
Singh did not specify the kind of combat aircraft that were shot down, but mentioned that aerial attacks also targeted another reconnaissance plane and “several F-16s” that were located in hangars at two airfields within Pakistan. Pakistan-specific travel guide
Unlike the remarks made by the Indian air chief, during a confrontation with India in May, the Pakistani Air Force reportedly downed six Indian military planes, among them three Rafale fighters, as an act of vengeance for India’s missile strike. The following day, a high-ranking French intelligence representative also told CNN that one Indian Air Force Rafale fighter was brought down by Pakistan, which may represent the initial documented battlefield loss of the French-built aircraft.
The defense chief remarked, “It’s ironic that high-ranking Indian military officials are being portrayed as symbols of major failures resulting from the short-sighted strategies of Indian political leaders.”
Asif mentioned that for three months following the conflict, no similar allegations were raised. He stated that Pakistan provided “comprehensive technical presentations” to the global press right after the event, with independent witnesses confirming the destruction of several Indian planes, including Rafale fighters.
This recognition, he stated, originated from “global leaders, top Indian officials, and foreign intelligence evaluations.”
The minister stated, “Not one Pakistani plane was damaged or destroyed by India,” adding that Pakistan had taken down six Indian fighter jets, S-400 missile systems, and drones, as well as disrupted multiple Indian airfields. He claimed that casualties among Indian troops near the Line of Control were significantly higher.
“If authenticity is at stake, let both parties disclose their aviation fleets for impartial inspection—although we believe this could reveal the actual situation that India aims to conceal,” Asif stated.
He cautioned that “conflicts are not achieved through lies but through ethical leadership, national determination, and skilled execution,” noting that “humorous stories designed for local political gain heighten the serious dangers of mistaken strategy in a world with nuclear weapons.”
Warning New Delhi not to breach Pakistan’s sovereignty, Asif stated, “As shown during Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, any infringement upon Pakistan’s sovereignty and territory will lead to immediate, certain, and appropriate retaliation, with all blame for subsequent tensions lying solely with those myopic leaders who risk South Asia’s stability for short-term political benefits.”
The Indian government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been strongly criticized by opposing political groups for not showing sufficient determination to address issues during the May conflicts and for failing to stop the Pahalgam incident.
The dispute in May began with New Delhi accusing Islamabad of involvement in a fatal incident in Pahalgam, an area under occupation in Kashmir. These claims lacked proof and were firmly denied by Pakistan. Following intense fighting on May 7 and reciprocal attacks on military bases, U.S. mediation led to a truce between the two parties on May 10.
oleh admin | Apr 7, 2025 | government, military, national security, politics, security
In August 2024, Adeola Oluwatosin Ajayi, a prominent figure within Nigeria’s intelligence sector, was appointed as the new Director-General of the Department of State Security.
After six months of being here, Ajayi is advocating for fresh ideas regarding Nigeria that imply the breakdown of the government’s conventional security framework and its role in addressing the escalating instability.
As stated by the head of DSS, communities—as opposed to the nation’s security agencies—ought to be considered the primary defense against present challenges.
He made
the proposal
In mid-February in Abuja, several current and former security officials were present, including the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, and the Chief of Defence Staff, Christopher Musa; neither raised objections to this dubious notion.
You shouldn’t anticipate that the Nigerian Army, police, and SSS will safeguard each individual citizen,” he stated. “That approach won’t be effective.
We anticipate that security agencies will carry out their duties. This aligns with the constitution, which states that “ensuring the safety and well-being of citizens should be the main objective of governance.” It emphasizes this as not just a secondary aim, but rather the principal one.
This indicates that ensuring the safety of citizens is the top priority for the national government of the federation, which holds authority over and manages the security organizations.
Ajayi provided instances of Nigerian communities that have successfully countered and thwarted assaults, suggesting these could serve as models for Nigeria to overcome its security challenges.
This is a feeble argument. Nigerian communities have consistently protected themselves, and continue to do so, even when faced with an uneven distribution of contemporary weaponry. They often confront assailants armed only with traditional weapons like sticks and machetes, while their adversaries wield more advanced firearms such as pistols and automatic rifles—tools frequently used by abductors, extremists, or sometimes law enforcement personnel against these groups.
The state holds the primary duty to safeguard its populace, an obligation that falls upon the government once they have taken their oath of office. However, in Nigeria, following the swearing-in of officials, the pursuit of opulence and a feeling of authority frequently overshadow this sense of commitment.
We should remember that the APC gained power in 2015 primarily due to the unrest in Nigeria, with Muhammadu Buhari promising to leverage his military expertise to tackle this issue.
This indicates that both he and his successor, President Bola Tinubu, have collectively held power for the APC party for 10 years, unfortunately resulting in an increased sense of insecurity across Nigeria.
Remember, Buhari spent considerable time in a London hospital as insecurity grew worse. Similarly, Tinubu has frequently traveled to France for various trips, seemingly mired in ineptitude or crafting excuses to shirk their duties. This lets citizens bear burdens that the law assigns to officially designated bodies and institutions.
“Our society emphasizes community,” Ajayi stated in his intricately crafted initial strategy for defense.
Why can’t we join forces against scoundrels and frauds?
I was unaware that powerful, violent, and well-organized terrorist organizations were referred to as “miscreants.”
The head of DSS continued, “It is essential for the elite class to engage with their respective communities, approach us for validation and advice, after which we can jointly curb these troublemakers… security begins at an individual level…”
What does ‘Join us… get some form of approval and guidance’ mean? Who exactly are these ‘us’? In what way do Nigerian communities ‘join us’?
What exactly does “some form of approval” mean? Is there anything in Nigerian law that allows the Department of State Services (DSS) to equip villages and communities with items like brooms and clubs to confront herders who are equipped with automatic firearms and GPS technology?
Through which routes will villagers journey from the various parts of Nigeria to reach the DSS Headquarters along the Lagos-Kano railway line?
The Ajayis within the Tinubu administration have overlooked another aspect beyond the constitution: the APC came to power through what many perceive as fraudulent means, having sworn to eradicate Nigeria’s security issues.
Sure, here’s the information retrieved from the website of the electoral commission:
the 2015 APC Manifesto
, where it grandiosely promoted “APC’s practical answers.”
In addition to other commitments, the party pledged to:
Hire at least an additional 100,000 police officers and create a well-trained and adequately equipped Federal Anti-Terrorism Multi-Agency Task Force aimed at dismantling Boko Haram and all forms of insurgency.
Implement an instant salary increase along with enhanced benefits for all five security teams.
Tackle the root causes of unemployment, poverty, and social inequality that sparked the uprising by implementing an all-encompassing economic development plan aimed at revitalizing the impacted regions and their populations.
The APC expressed concerns: “Sixty percent of Nigerians reside below the poverty line, merely three percent receive adequate healthcare, and only about half of our children progress from primary to secondary education. Additionally, our roadways and railway networks are severely deteriorated. Fewer than thirty-five percent of the population has reliable access to electricity, with many experiencing frequent outages and persistent power deficits…”
It stated, “The Nigerian population requires assistance; aid from mismanagement, respite from the severe poverty faced by so many of us; relief from a deteriorating nation. An APC administration would deliver this support.”
Relief? A decade later, the APC had merely exacerbated the issues, leading to stratification marked by opulence and laziness among the elite and their relatives.
This all happened as the economy crashed, the naira depreciated sharply, major corporations withdrew, the power supply became unstable, joblessness surged, and many Nigerians migrated to neighboring countries like Niger, Cameroon, and Ghana. Wealthy Nigerians often relocate their loved ones overseas.
Rather than achieving security, we have accumulated an
Air Force arsenal
as the terrorists gain strength, which targets civilians, while the National Security Adviser offers praise
phantom “Tinubu Gains
.”
In January 2024, the Nigerian armed forces
announced
that it had dispatched its special forces throughout the nation as part of an intensified effort against insurgency, kidnappings, and various security threats.
In January 2025, Air Force chief Hassan Abubakar also
announced
That the Air Force completed 15,915 flight hours over an 18-month period. Then why has Nigeria become more insecure?
The issue lies within the lack of sincerity among Nigeria’s leaders, which keeps the country stagnant. The fact that Tinubu took a private trip to France while the crisis in Uromi was unfolding and as new US trade barriers were approaching serves as a reminder that he does not perceive our situation with any sense of immediacy.
Thus, Nigeria seems to be operating on autopilot with issues like insecurity, inadequate infrastructure, and a shrinking economy becoming routine. This situation is perpetuated by a government that believes citizens who are struggling to make ends meet should manage on their own.
However, it is not typical citizens such as Ajayi who possess the legal power to operate across Nigeria’s 36 states and 774 local government areas. If the DSS under Ajayi fails to recognize and neutralize these terrorist groups—which lack airports, sea ports, or diplomatic facilities—but can still freely resupply with weapons, then they bear responsibility for this failure.
How can armed herders managed by the DSS move freely to remote villages and farms across the nation, carrying out unchecked violence?
Why, DSS, are the intelligence agencies reveling in all the authority, prestige, armaments, and funds, whereas it is the impoverished citizens who have to resort to taking up weapons?
In this era of remarkable technological advancements, why is DSS concealing itself in Abuja, offering security and domestic assistance to politicians as Nigeria faces turmoil?
Perhaps citizens ought to take their defense into their own hands, rendering the DSS an unnecessary extravagance. If this were to happen, then it should be dismantled first.
Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).
oleh admin | Apr 3, 2025 | china taiwan relations, military, news, politics, taiwan
Experts suggest that the PLA is experimenting with various tactics, such as blockades and anti-access approaches, gradually advancing nearer to the island with each attempt.
Every military exercise conducted close to
Taiwan
The maneuvers conducted by the People’s Liberation Army—including this week’s exercises—have demonstrated additional advancements in the tactical skills and coordination of mainland forces, ranging from simulated assaults to anti-access strategies, as noted by experts.
The PLA
Since August 2022, when the then Speaker of the US House of Representatives was in office, they have carried out six extensive drill sessions.
Nancy Pelosi
explored the autonomous island, showcasing varied maneuvers in every section.
The drills have expanded in scope, coming increasingly nearer to Taiwan, thereby reducing the island’s strategic room for maneuver and response times. Key harbors and possible amphibious assault locations are now effectively under Beijing’s control,” according to mainland military commentator Fu Qianshao.
Are you looking for insights into the most significant issues and developments globally? Find your answers here.
SCMP Knowledge
Our latest platform features handpicked content including explainers, FAQs, analyses, and infographics, all provided by our acclaimed team.
Furthermore, these exercises have enhanced the PLA’s capability to respond to external interference, reaching well beyond Taiwan’s shores. This demonstrates a clear message to the United States and its allies in the region, such as Japan, he pointed out.
Getting closer
Collin Koh, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, noted that there has been a steady progression in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) exercises, characterized by the incorporation of additional components and enhanced intricacy over time.
What we’re observing is a carefully planned effort to replicate situations as closely as possible to actual world conditions. This means it’s not merely for show or demonstration purposes. Clearly, the PLA is focused on improving and strengthening its capability to execute such missions should they be required.
Koh pointed out that unlike past drills, there were no specific practice zones near Taiwan this week—a change that introduced ambiguity for commercial ships and added more pressure on the Taiwanese military forces.
There is significantly reduced clarity for commercial aviation and maritime operations. Once drilling areas are identified, the Taiwanese military can concentrate their efforts on these specific regions. Currently, without defined zones, they must maintain a state of heightened readiness everywhere, essentially from every direction.
In the August 2022 drill, PLA forces surrounded Taiwan with six designated exercise zones. The closest, situated southeast of the island, was 20km (12.4 miles) from the port of Kaohsiung at its nearest point.
The Taiwanese defense ministry reported that 11 Dongfeng-class missiles were launched towards Taiwan during the exercise, with four of these projectiles passing over the principal island for the first time.
In addition, there were unprecedented accounts of alleged drone sightings over Quemoy, an island governed by Taiwan, referred to as Kinmen.
In the May 2024 drill, yet another milestone occurred as mainland coast guard ships ventured close to the islands of Wuqiu and Dongyin, which are controlled by Taiwan. This action challenged the Taiwanese claim of limited access to these waters, as per Beijing’s perspective.
Comparable patrols took place once more on the opening day of this week’s exercises, which commenced on Tuesday and Wednesday in reaction to Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te’s security measures against mainland China.
Although no specific live-fire zones near the island were officially declared for this week’s drills, experts observed that these exercises took place nearer to Taiwan than previous ones.
f
ore and also featured joint blockade and control manoeuvres.
Additionally, there were simulated precise attacks on strategic locations, one of which was a mock Taiwanese liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility.
The PLA Eastern Theater Command spokesperson, Senior Colonel Shi Yi, stated that during this week’s two-day operation codenamed Strait Thunder-2025A, their naval, air, and missile units converged on Taiwan from various angles.
According to Reuters, Taiwanese officials reported that over ten naval vessels from Mainland China moved closer to Taiwan’s 24-nautical-mile adjacent waters on Tuesday morning.
Countering intervention
On Wednesday, the Shandong naval strike force participated in military exercises organized by the PLA, entering from the east of the island, facing away from the Taiwan Strait. As reported by Taipei, this fleet entered their identification zone, coming as close as 190 nautical miles.
The PLA stated that the Shandong conducted strike drills targeting both land and sea objectives, assessing its proficiency in executing joint operations within and beyond the island chain, along with various multidimensional blockades and control tactics.
Additionally, a significant aspect of the recent exercise was how Shandong operated differently—approaching from the east side of the Philippines rather than going through the Bashi Channel as Liaoning did in October of last year.
As reported by Taiwan’s RW News citing unnamed military sources, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has recently adopted new tactics that deviate from past practices, with expectations of further “coercion strategies” aimed at intimidating Taiwan, thus escalating the challenges to its security.
It marked the third occasion that the PLA sent an aircraft carrier for these exercises, and the second time involving the Shandong, which also participated in the April 2023 drills following a meeting between Taiwan’s previous leader, Tsai Ing-wen, and Kevin McCarthy—a successor to Nancy Pelosi—in the United States.
In October 2024, the Liaoning aircraft carrier participated in exercises for the inaugural time, carrying out maneuvers that mimicked several intervention situations. This display was interpreted as a show of force aimed at discouraging outside interference.
As another sign to the United States, recent exercises featured imagery of PLA H-6K bombers equipped with sophisticated YJ-21 hypersonic anti-ship missiles, highlighting China’s intent to discourage outside intervention in case of a possible confrontation over Taiwan.
Beijing considers Taiwan as part of its own territory and aims to unify it with the mainland, even resorting to military action if needed. Similar to many nations, the United States does not acknowledge Taiwan as a separate sovereign nation. Nevertheless, Washington has pledged to supply weapons to Taipei to ensure its defense against potential attacks.
Coastguards and blockade
China’s coastal patrol vessels have taken on a more significant presence during these exercises, seeming to employ tactics aimed at potentially encircling the island.
The coast guard became involved in May of the previous year when their ships conducted patrols close to two islands controlled by Taipei.
During the October 2024 exercises, four squadrons of Coast Guard vessels were dispatched, among them being the fleet’s biggest ship, the 10,000-ton CCG 2901, which navigated close to Taiwan.
During recent exercises—which also featured the idea of “critical port and zone management”—the coast guard dispatched three fleets along with an additional trio of ships for patrols near the island.
Last year, a report from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies suggested that China might be contemplating employing its coast guard in potential future maritime blockades as their responsibilities continue to expand.
According to the report, Beijing might leverage global views of the coast guard as a civilian organization to exert effective control over Taiwan by interfering with airborne and marine activities.
In Beijing’s view, obstructing Taiwan’s energy supplies might have substantial repercussions for the island’s economy and societal well-being.
The island depends significantly on imported energy sources, notably liquefied natural gas, with these specific ports being essential for this process.
More Articles from SCMP
The Joy Luck Club” actress Kieu Chinh, at 87, reflects on her challenging journey to fame and explores new acting opportunities.
Val Kilmer’s children, Mercedes and Jack Kilmer, have also pursued careers in acting. Both appeared alongside their father in several movies, such as “Paydirt” and “Palo Alto.”
Jumbo Legend passes first staying test as Caspar Fownes notches a Happy Valley double
Beijing urges HSBC to aid in enhancing Sino-British relations and improving Hong Kong’s reputation.
The article initially appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), which serves as the premier source for news coverage of China and Asia.
Copyright © 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
oleh admin | Apr 3, 2025 | foreign policy, military, national security, politics, u.s. china relations
The visit of U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Asia has caused quite an uproar, with the blame falling squarely on the United States and its assertive approach. During his tour, he traveled to the Philippines and Japan—key U.S. allies that house many American military installations, likely positioning them as crucial players in any confrontation involving China. There, Hegseth seized the moment to heavily criticize Beijing and covertly bolster backing for Taiwan’s autonomy.
As a countermeasure, China carried out military exercises near Taiwan’s north, south, and east coast areas, serving as an explicit warning against secessionist tendencies. Additionally, Chinese authorities released a harsh critique labeling Taiwan’s leader as a ‘parasite.’ This action represents a significant intensification compared to earlier military practices, usually pre-announced and integrated into routine training schedules. In contrast, this recent move demonstrated Beijing’s immediate and unequivocal stance, indicating their readiness for prompt reprisals should provocative statements continue.
These events occur at a crucial time. U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs have estranged important partners such as Japan and South Korea, prompting them to seek increased economic collaboration with China in order to craft a coordinated strategy against Washington’s trade actions. The presumed solidarity within an anti-China coalition in Asia might prove weaker than what the United States expected, as local powers reconsider the hazards of aligning too tightly with America’s geostrategic objectives.
This is notably clear regarding Ukraine’s situation. Having once been a crucial Western partner, it has had its population and assets depleted, and has been utilized for its residual natural resources before being left behind. Aggressive moves by the United States will likely exacerbate divisions within the region and heighten the risk of unrest instead of solidifying the alliances they aim to preserve.
Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).
oleh admin | Apr 3, 2025 | israel, israel and the middle east, military, syria, warfare
The Syrian Foreign Ministry characterized Israel’s assaults on five areas throughout the nation as an “unwarranted escalation.”
On Thursday, Syria denounced the lethal Israeli attacks throughout the nation as a “blatant infringement” of its sovereignty, following Israel’s statement that it had targeted “military assets.”
The Syrian government’s news outlets stated that the airstrikes took place near a defense research facility in Damascus, along with several other locations. Meanwhile, an independent monitoring group claimed that at least four people were killed in this recent Israeli assault on Syria, which comes after extremist factions, following their overthrow of longtime leader Bashar al-Assad, gained control.
The Syrian Foreign Ministry stated in aTelegram message that Israeli forces conducted aerial attacks on five different areas throughout the nation, blatantly breaching both international law and Syrian sovereignty.
Are you curious about the most significant issues and global trends? Find out here with
SCMP Knowledge
Our latest platform features handpicked content including explainers, FAQs, analyses, and infographics, all provided by our esteemed team of experts.
This unwarranted intensification is an intentional effort to undermine Syria’s stability and increase the hardship faced by its population.
The report indicated that the airstrikes led to the “almost complete devastation” of a military airbase in the central Syrian province of Hama, resulting in injuries among numerous civilians and troops.
The Syrian state-run SANA news agency reported a strike that “hit the area near the scientific research facility” in Damascus’s northwestern Barzeh neighborhood, as well as a raid in the vicinity of Hama, though they did not specify exactly what was struck.
The Israeli military stated in a release that their forces targeted “remaining military assets at the Syrian airbases of Hama and T4, as well as further residual military installations around Damascus.”
Israel has stated its desire to stop weapons from being obtained by the new leadership, which it views as extremists.
The Syrian ministry stated that these attacks occurred while the nation was attempting to reconstruct itself following 14 years of conflict, describing it as an attempt to “normalize violence within the country.”
A few weeks ago, Israel reported that it had attacked the T4 military base in central Homs province two times, aiming to strike military assets located there.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that “four individuals lost their lives and several others sustained injuries, among them staff from the Syrian defense ministry, as a result of the attacks on Hama military airport.”
The monitoring group stated that these attacks, aimed at “the leftover aircraft, runways, and control towers,” rendered the entire airport non-operational. Additionally, they reported that the strikes in Damascus were focused on the research center located in Barzeh.
Following Assad’s downfall on December 8, the Britain-based Observatory noted Israeli attacks aimed at the center of the area.
In 2018, Western nations such as the United States had attacked the defense ministry site, claiming it was connected to Syria’s “chemical weapons facilities.”
Additionally, following Assad’s downfall, Israel has stationed soldiers in a United Nations-monitored neutral area within the strategically significant Golan Heights. They have also advocated for full disarmament in southern Syria, an area adjacent to the Israeli-occupied Golan region.
The authorities in southern Syria’s Daraa announced via Telegram late Wednesday that multiple Israeli military vehicles had entered a region in the western part of the province. They also reported that “three Israeli artillery shells” were fired at the area.
The Observatory has noted multiple instances of Israeli military intrusions into southern Syria, extending past the demarcation line, over the last few months.
Last month, when visiting Jerusalem, the European Union’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas stated that Israel’s attacks on Syria were “unwarranted” and could potentially escalate tensions further.
More Articles from SCMP
How Malaysia’s Data Centers Became the Driving Force Behind China’s AI Goals
Beijing urges HSBC to aid in enhancing Sino-British relations and improving Hong Kong’s reputation.
Jumbo Legend clears its first stewards test as Caspar Fownes secures a double at Happy Valley.
Hong Kong shares drop to their lowest point in six weeks due to Trump’s tariffs, with exporters leading the decline.
The article initially appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), which serves as the premier source of news covering China and Asia.
Copyright © 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Halaman 1 dari 912345...»Akhir »
